Back to Top

Inewhair

Announcement

Stay informed with the various updates from New Hair

[Style column] The reason why non-incisional hair transplantation is also possible with a high engraftment rate

hit.4,037

Input time: 2012.07.20 19:49:38

[Style column] The reason why non-incisional hair transplantation is also possible with a high engraftment rate

It is commonly known that non-incisional hair transplantation has a low engraftment rate and a poor surgical success rate. However, if the hair to be transplanted is carefully inspected using a microscope during the surgical procedure, the success rate of the hair transplant can be greatly increased. The biggest difference between

incisional hair transplantation (FUE) and non-incisional hair transplantation (FUSS) is the’hair collection process’. In the incision method, the hair is removed in the form of a long band from the back of the head and then separated one by one through a microscope, but in the non-incisional hair transplantation, each hair follicle is individually collected.
The hair follicles collected one by one in this way are immediately transferred to the transplant site. In this process, the hair follicles collected in this process must be observed individually with a microscope to check whether there are any problems before transplanting. This is because it is not large enough to be fully confirmed just by looking with the eyes.

However, if each hair follicle is checked under a microscope and unnecessary elements for transplantation are removed, a skilled surgical team is required as in non-incisional hair transplantation, and it is difficult to maintain a low operating cost due to the burden of labor costs . However , even if you think about it from common sense , it makes no sense that there is no difference between visually checking small and fine tissues like hair and checking them with a microscope. Can you plant it randomly without confirming whether the seed is healthy or alive, and expect it to grow? If a microscope is used, it is not impossible to achieve equivalent results, although it cannot exceed the results of incisional hair transplantation. The difference between the non-incisional method and the incisional method is in the hair collection process. It is very dangerous to omit the microscopic check just because it was collected in a’follicular unit’. Although the method of collection is different, checking for abnormalities in hair follicles before transplantation should not be omitted for any reason . These days, recovery is quick and scars

The demands of patients are increasing because of the fact that there are few remaining, and unskilled hospitals are also increasing accordingly. However, it is still difficult to assess the competence of hospitals and doctors on their own .

Since hair transplant surgery is performed only by local anesthesia at the transplant site, the entire procedure can be checked by the person himself. It is advisable to check before surgery as to whether all hair follicles must be checked under a microscope during surgery, and whether a surgical record of the confirmed hair follicle condition is written.

But first of all, you need to see a doctor who will test whether a non-incisional hair transplant is suitable for you. If you consider it rude to go to a hospital and ask questions directly in front of a doctor, and if you don’t check it properly, you may get irreversible results.

NHI New Hair Hair Transplantation Center Jin-oh Kim Director

View original text: http://sports.hankooki.com/lpage/life/201207/sp2012072019493895530.htm